A Highly Polished People

IT was just as extensive as it suited the personal interest of the Resident to make it;* but on a different system it may be contemplated, that its importance will not fall short of that which is now attached to China. The restrictions which exist do not arise so much from the limitations and institutions of the Japanese, as from the nature and constitution of the Dutch factory:* the degraded state of which would appear to have sunk the Dutch character very low in estimation.

The Japanese are a highly polished people, considerably advanced in science, highly inquisitive and full of penetration. There seems no reason to doubt the estimate of the population (twenty-five millions); nor the high character given of the country, and of the people, by the early voyagers; and on the score of religion and its prejudices, on which so much has been industriously circulated by the Dutch,* they are found to be simple and inoffensive.

abridged

Abridged from ‘Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles’ (1830, by his wife Lady Sophia Raffles (1786-1858).

A polite way of saying that hitherto trade with Japan had been frustrated by the limited imagination of the British Residents at Bencoolen, on the otherwise Dutch-controlled island of Sumatra. Bencoolen, today Bengkulu in Indonesia, was a British Residency from 1785 to 1825; Raffles became Lieutenant-Governor there in 1818, and served until 1824.

In this context, ‘factory’ means a warehouse, not a place of mass production, though factories in the modern sense did now exist thanks to Richard Arkwright.

Raffles suspected that the Dutch cynically circulated discouraging reports of Japan to put their trade rivals off, but he also felt that the slovenly way the Dutch did business there made the Japanese think ill of all Europeans. Raffles was also influenced by his pride in England’s moves towards the abolition of the slave trade, which he feared the Dutch would reverse; in fact they did not, and in a letter to William Wilberforce in 1819 Raffles admitted that he was sometimes unfair to the Dutch.

Précis
Raffles argued that with the right policy, Britain’s trade with Japan could be as important to her as trade with her already profitable China. He firmly laid the blame at the door of the Dutch, who (he said) deliberately talked down the Japanese in order to discourage rivals, whereas he found the Japanese polished, modern and unprejudiced.
Questions for Critics

1. What is the author aiming to achieve in writing this?

2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that strike you. How do they help the author communicate his ideas more effectively?

3. What impression does this passage make on you? How might you put that impression into words?

Based on The English Critic (1939) by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn, Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University, USA.

Sevens

Suggest answers to this question. See if you can limit one answer to exactly seven words.

Whom did Raffles blame for the poor state of British trade with Japan?

Suggestion

The Dutch, and their factory in Japan.

Jigsaws

Express the ideas below in a single sentence, using different words as much as possible. Do not be satisfied with the first answer you think of; think of several, and choose the best.

Raffles said the trading system must change. He said trade with Japan would then grow. He said it would match trade with China.

Read Next

Sir William Sterndale Bennett

Acclaimed in Germany as a composer on a par with Mendelssohn himself, Bennett sacrificed his life and talents for music in Britain.

‘Tremblingly Obey!’

Following a historic embassy in 1792-93, Chien Lung, the Emperor of China, despatched a haughty letter rebuffing King George III’s offer of trade.

Horatius at the Bridge

Horatius Cocles was the last man standing between Rome’s republic and the return of totalitarian government in 509 BC.