The Copy Book

He Is Only Defending the Land of the Zulus!

Frances Colenso admired the gallantry of the men who defended the fort at Rorke’s Drift, and the restraint of the men who attacked it.

Part 1 of 2

1879

Queen Victoria 1837-1901

King Cetshwayo, photographed by Alex Bassano and published in 1885.

By Alex Bassano, published 1885. Public domain.

Show More

Back to text

He Is Only Defending the Land of the Zulus!

By Alex Bassano, published 1885. Public domain. Source

King Cetshwayo, photographed by Alex Bassano and published in 1885.

X

A photograph of King Cetshwayo kaMpande (1826-1884), taken in London and published in Frances Colenso’s The Ruin of Zululand in 1885, the year after the king died. The Zulu lived in Natal, so named by by Vasco da Gama on Christmas Day in 1497, and subsequently a Dutch colony which was then occupied by the British in 1842. In 1878 Sir Bartle Frere, High Commissioner of all South Africa, demanded that the Zulu disband their entire army, which Cetshwayo had been steadily strengthening. The king, reasoning that with so warlike a neighbour complete demilitarization would hasten the break-up of his kingdom and his people, refused to comply, and the Zulu War began at Isandlhwana in January 1879.

Back to text

Introduction

On January 22nd, 1879, some 150 British soldiers repelled an attack by several thousand Zulu warriors on a tiny garrison at Rorke’s Drift. It was a gallant action in an otherwise dubious war: the British colony of Natal had picked a quarrel with King Cetshwayo of the Zulus as an excuse to annex his realm. Frances Colenso, daughter of the Bishop of Natal, appreciated the Zulus’ restraint.

THE first great battle in that Zulu war was that of Isandhlwana,* which so many a home in England as well as in Zululand has sorrowful cause to remember. For ten days our invading armies worked their will in Zululand, meeting no army, yet burning the homes, killing the men, and sweeping off great herds of cattle. But on January 22, 1879, the Zulus were victorious on their own soil, and then, at Cetshwayo’s bidding, stayed their hand, and did not ravage Natal, which lay open and helpless at their mercy.

It is sometimes urged that the colony owed its safety at that time to the brave stand made by British troops at Rorke’s Drift. What are the facts? At Rorke’s Drift was a farmhouse used as a military post and hospital. It was some fourteen miles further along the river, on the Natal bank, and it was attacked by the Zulus at the close of the Isandhlwana battle, as forming part and parcel of the invading army. The defence was a successful one and a gallant one. Major Chard, who was in command, gained there the Victoria Cross, and the Zulu detachment lost heavily before retiring.

Continue to Part 2

* On the afternoon of January 22nd, 1878, over 20,000 Zulu warriors confronted barely 1,800 soldiers of the British Army, and unsurprisingly soundly defeated them. The name means ‘little hand’.

* Exulting in their victory at Isandhlwana, the Zulus pressed their advantage by an assault on a small garrison at Rorke’s Drift (ford) a few miles away. The fort, chiefly stores and a hospital, put up a remarkable resistance, some 150 soldiers and civilians managing to hold upwards of 5,000 Zulu warriors at bay until the morning, when the weary Zulus withdrew, about an hour before the British relief column came in sight.