The Copy Book

The Prophecy of Peter of Pomfret

Peter foretold that King John would cease to be England’s sovereign, and he was right, though John still wore his crown.

Part 1 of 3

1213
In the Time of

King John 1199-1216

Back to text

The Prophecy of Peter of Pomfret

By Edward Altham (1629–1694), via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain. Source

The artist Edward Altham as a hermit.

X

A self-portrait of English artist Edward Altham (1629–1694) as a hermit. This is a copy by an unknown artist, painted in about 1680-1690. According to Matthew Paris, Peter told the King that “he would not be King on the day of the Ascension of the Lord next following, nor thereafter; but that on that day the crown of England would pass to another.” After securing his throne by pooling the country’s sovereignty in the Government of Rome, John thought he had outsmarted his doom and had Peter hanged, but in every sense that matters Peter was right: another now ruled in England.

Back to text

The artist Edward Altham as a hermit.

Enlarge & read more...
By Edward Altham (1629–1694), via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain.

A self-portrait of English artist Edward Altham (1629–1694) as a hermit. This is a copy by an unknown artist, painted in about 1680-1690. According to Matthew Paris, Peter told the King that “he would not be King on the day of the Ascension of the Lord next following, nor thereafter; but that on that day the crown of England would pass to another.” After securing his throne by pooling the country’s sovereignty in the Government of Rome, John thought he had outsmarted his doom and had Peter hanged, but in every sense that matters Peter was right: another now ruled in England.

Introduction

Peter of Pomfret (Pontefract, near Wakefield in Yorkshire’s West Riding) was a simple, unlettered hermit who incautiously prophesied that by Ascension Day in 1213, King John would no longer be king of England. When that day had passed, and John still sat upon his throne, the King had poor Peter hanged; but as Sir George Wrong explains, the prophecy wasn’t so wide of the mark.

When Hubert Walter, Archbishop of Canterbury, died in 1205 the younger monks of Canterbury hurriedly elected their sub-prior as archbishop, and sent him to Rome for confirmation, while the elder monks supported the candidate whom John sent to Rome, John de Grey, Bishop of Norwich.* But Pope Innocent III, the strongest and most determined man of his time, took advantage of the dispute to reject both claimants, and appointed his own nominee, Stephen Langton,* an English cardinal at Rome. The Canterbury monks acquiesced, and confirmed the nomination, but John was furious. He drove the new archbishop’s father from England, refused to allow Langton himself to put his foot in the country, and finally seized some of the Church’s possessions.

Innocent was not the man to be compelled by such means to give up his purpose, and he promptly placed England under an interdict* and closed the churches; baptism and extreme unction were allowed, but apparently no religious rites hallowed marriage or burial. John, as a chronicler says, “was wonderfully little disturbed,” and probably the clergy did not fully obey the interdict, under which England lay for nearly seven years.

Continue to Part 2

* John de Grey (?1170-1214) was Bishop of Norwich from 1200, and despite the Pope’s rebuff in the matter of Canterbury, remained a trusted councillor of the King. The sub-prior was named Reginald.

* Stephen Langton (?1150-1228) was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1207 to his death in 1228.

* This was in March 1208.

Précis

In 1207, Stephen Langton was an English cardinal in Rome, appointed Archbishop of Canterbury by Pope Innocent III against the wishes of King John. The furious King barred Langton from entering the country, and confiscated Church property. The Pope responded with a country-wide Interdict, a severe reprimand that was not taken to heart by the King. (56 / 60 words)

In 1207, Stephen Langton was an English cardinal in Rome, appointed Archbishop of Canterbury by Pope Innocent III against the wishes of King John. The furious King barred Langton from entering the country, and confiscated Church property. The Pope responded with a country-wide Interdict, a severe reprimand that was not taken to heart by the King.

Edit | Reset

Variations: 1.increase the length of this precis to exactly 60 words. 2.reduce the length of this precis to exactly 50 words. 3.introduce one of the following words into the precis: despite, just, may, must, or, ought, since, whether.

Word Games

Sevens Based on this passage

Suggest answers to this question. See if you can limit one answer to exactly seven words.

Why did Innocent III place England under an interdict in March 1208?

Suggestion

Variations: 1.expand your answer to exactly fourteen words. 2.expand your answer further, to exactly twenty-one words. 3.include one of the following words in your answer: if, but, despite, because, (al)though, unless.

Jigsaws Based on this passage

Express the ideas below in a single sentence, using different words as much as possible. Do not be satisfied with the first answer you think of; think of several, and choose the best.

John wanted John de Grey as Archbishop of Canterbury. The Pope appointed Stephen Langton. John rejected Stephen Langton.

Variation: Try rewriting your sentence so that it uses one or more of these words: 1. Candidate 2. Favour 3. Override

Post Box : Help Available

If you like what I’m doing here on Clay Lane, from time to time you could buy me a coffee.

Buy Me a Coffee is a crowdfunding website, used by over a million people. It is designed to help content creators like me make a living from their work. ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ prides itself on its security, and there is no need to register.