The Copy Book

Revolution and Reaction

John Buchan draws a distinction between political changes brought by violence and those brought by progress.

1923

King George V 1910-1936

By Boris Kustodiev (1878–1927), via Wikimedia Commons. Licence: Public domain.

Show More

Back to text

Revolution and Reaction

By Boris Kustodiev (1878–1927), via Wikimedia Commons. Licence: Public domain. Source
X

‘Bolshevik’, by Boris Mikhaylovich Kustodiev (1878–1927). Buchan quickly realised that the October Revolution of 1917 had merely replaced one absolute power with another, and a far worse one. Tsar Nicholas II and his wife Alix (Queen Victoria’s grand-daughter) had just begun to entertain the idea of a more liberal constitution, and Russia was beginning to embrace private enterprise, industrialisation, sport and many other things that help to make civilisation. All this was destroyed or twisted by the Communists. Happily, the progress so rudely interrupted has been resumed since the early 1990s, though jealous Western powers have been straining every sinew to prevent it.

Back to text

Introduction

John Buchan’s historical research and long experience in Government led him to believe that revolutions achieved little. Political betterment, he argued, comes not from violent overthrow by small, ideologically-driven groups of activists but from the natural wasting away of repression owing to popular dislike.

THERE have been many thousands of revolutions since the world began; nearly all have been the work of minorities, often small minorities; and nearly all, after a shorter or longer period of success, have utterly failed. The French Revolution altered the face of the world, but only when it had ceased to be a revolution and had developed into an absolute monarchy.* So with the various outbreaks of 1848.* So conspicuously with the Russian Revolution of today, which has developed principles the exact opposite of those with which it started.*

The exception proves the rule, as we see in the case of our own English Revolution of 1688.* Properly considered, that was not a revolution, but a reaction.* The revolution had been against the personal and unlimited monarchy of the Stuarts.* In 1688 there was a return to the normal development of English society, which had been violently broken. It may fairly be said that a revolution to be successful must be a reaction — that is, it must be a return to an organic historical sequence, which for some reason or other has been interrupted.

From the General Introduction to each volume of ‘The Nations of To-Day: A New History of the World’ (1935) by John Buchan.

A reference to the coronation of the Emperor Napoleon in 1802, thirteen years after the French Revolution itself, and his subsequent attempt to forge a united Europe governed under his Napoleonic Code.

A wave of revolutions in Europe sometimes dubbed the Spring of Nations, affecting among others France, the German states, the Austrian Empire, the Kingdom of Hungary, the Italian states, Denmark, Wallachia, and Poland. As Buchan indicates, the revolutions themselves were intended as movements for democracy and liberty, but did not achieve their goals; indeed, they provoked an increased State control and fear of liberty (while paying lip-service to it) in the political establishment which has had long-lasting effects.

In the sense that it began (at least in theory) as a repudiation of absolute government, yet in the form of the Soviet Union fell into a despotism worse than the one which it sought to replace.

See Home Page. King James II abdicated and fled to France rather than fight Parliament’s preferred choice as King and Queen, James’s daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange. William was a grandson of King Charles I, and so also Mary’s cousin.

In 1873, John Bright recalled how, when his friend Richard Cobden was brokering the Cobden-Chevalier Treaty with France in 1860, Napoleon III sighed and said: “It is very difficult in France. In England you make reforms, in France we make revolutions”.

The Civil Wars of 1639-60 were a revolution (or more precisely a military coup) that ultimately achieved nothing but bloodshed and a new absolutism under Cromwell, and a brief return of the old one under James II. In 1688, the country transitioned calmly from absolutism to constitutional monarchy under William III and Mary II.

Archive

Word Games

Spinners Find in Think and Speak

For each group of words, compose a sentence that uses all three. You can use any form of the word: for example, cat → cats, go → went, or quick → quickly, though neigh → neighbour is stretching it a bit.

This exercise uses words found in the accompanying passage.

1 Alter. Opposite. Various.

2 May. Minority. Thousand.

3 Absolute. Small. Start.

Variations: 1. include direct and indirect speech 2. include one or more of these words: although, because, despite, either/or, if, unless, until, when, whether, which, who 3. use negatives (not, isn’t, neither/nor, never, nobody etc.)

Verb and Noun Find in Think and Speak

Many words can serve as noun or verb depending on context: see if you can prove this with the examples below. Nouns go well with words such as the/a, or his/her; verbs go well after I/you/he etc..

This exercise uses words found in the accompanying passage.

1 Reason. 2 Work. 3 Rule. 4 Break. 5 Case. 6 Start. 7 Return. 8 Face. 9 Fail.

Variations: 1.if possible, use your noun in the plural, e.g. cat → cats. 2.use your verb in a past form, e.g. go → went. 3.use your noun in a sentence with one of these words: any, enough, fewer, less, no, some.

Homophones Find in Think and Speak

In each group below, you will find words that sound the same, but differ in spelling and also in meaning. Compose your own sentences to bring out the differences between them.

This exercise uses words found in the accompanying passage.

1. Altar. Alter. 2. There. Their. They’re. 3. Fair. Fare. 4. Sees. Seas. Seize. 5. Scene. Seen. 6. Knot. Not. 7. But. Butt. 8. Principle. Principal. 9. Some. Sum.

Add Vowels Find in Think and Speak

Make words by adding vowels to each group of consonants below. You may add as many vowels as you like before, between or after the consonants, but you may not add any consonants or change the order of those you have been given. See if you can beat our target of common words.

crls (5+1)

See Words

carols. cereals. corals. creoles. curls.

creels.

Related Posts

Popular Misconceptions

A good knowledge of history is essential if we are to understand how words such as liberty and democracy are understood.

An Embarrassment of Heroes

John Buchan warned that the great figures of history are often beyond their biographers’ comprehension.

The Machinery of State

Human beings should not be frantic cogs spinning away in the Government’s factory of Progress.

False Unity

The German Empire promised wonders to restless, grudging Europe, and not to let common sense wake us from our dreams.