The Friendship of Trade

BUT if these 84,000,000 had a tariff as free as ours* — or a moderate tariff, say, or 5 or 10 per cent, on imports from England — the trade of this country with Russia would gradually and certainly increase, and as it increased our suspicions of Russia would gradually fade away, and the hostile feelings which Russia necessarily has towards us would also rapidly subside, and the blessed effects of trade, which some people call selfish and low, but which God has made to be one of the most beneficent influences among mankind — the great and blessed effects of trade, I say, would put an end to the animosity which has existed between these two great nations, and enable Russia, and ourselves also, to diminish to a large extent military expenditure, and to do what can be done to promote a happier and more tranquil condition of things throughout the continent of Europe.*

From ‘Public Addresses’ (1879) by John Bright (1811-1889), edited James E. Thorold Rogers. The speech was delivered on April 16th, 1879, in Birmingham.

* Low or zero tariffs on overseas trade were a relatively new feature of British policy, one for which John Bright and his mentor Richard Cobden (1804-1865) could claim much of the credit. The Russians had flirted with Free Trade some years earlier, but lost their nerve and gone back back to Protectionism, which uses tax and regulation to cosset domestic producers and discourage foreign competition. Consequently, British people buying goods from Russia had few or no import duties to pay, whereas Russian people buying goods from the UK had to pay very high import duties.

* Cobden and Bright objected to Protectionism not only because it raised prices and stifled smaller businesses, but also because Protectionist politicians thought of other peoples as rivals rather than customers, and geared their economic and military policy towards beggaring or even annexing their neighbours: see David Hume on The Jealousy of Trade. Bright’s solution to Anglo-Russian relations was neither to humble Russia nor to absorb her into the Empire, but for Britain to propose a free-trade treaty like the Cobden-Chevalier Treaty of 1860, which had marked a welcome new era in Anglo-French relations. In a debate in the House on May 19th that same year, Robert Bourke, MP for King’s Lynn, reminded the Commons that European countries which had such tariff treaties with the UK had seen their economies leap, whereas those which did not were stagnating.

Précis
Trade with Russia, said Bright, would never flourish while Russia imposed such high tariffs on imports; but we could hardly complain. given our own ungracious and hostile attitude towards Russia. It was up to Britain to propose a free trade agreement, to cement our friendship and so calm the tensions which led to so much wasteful military spending.
Questions for Critics

1. What is the author aiming to achieve in writing this?

2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that strike you. How do they help the author communicate his ideas more effectively?

3. What impression does this passage make on you? How might you put that impression into words?

Based on The English Critic (1939) by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn, Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University, USA.

Read Next

The Anglo-Zanzibar War

It lasted barely forty minutes, but it brought slavery to an end in the little island territory.

The Ape and the Fox

A valuable lesson when dealing with practised liars.

Belshazzar’s Feast

Prince Belshazzar’s disrespectful behaviour left him facing the original ‘writing on the wall’.