The Footprints at the Gate

What Dr Mortimer saw beside the body of Sir Charles Baskerville sent him hastily to London, to consult Sherlock Holmes.

1902

Introduction

The legend of the Baskerville hound, a ghostly dog haunting every generation of that respectable Devonshire family, was not the kind of thing a man of science like Dr Mortimer took seriously. Yet after Sir Charles Baskerville was found dead, something made him rush up to London to consult Sherlock Holmes.

“FINALLY I carefully examined the body, which had not been touched until my arrival. Sir Charles lay on his face, his arms out, his fingers dug into the ground, and his features convulsed with some strong emotion to such an extent that I could hardly have sworn to his identity.

“There was certainly no physical injury of any kind. But one false statement was made by Barrymore* at the inquest. He said that there were no traces upon the ground round the body. He did not observe any. But I did — some little distance off, but fresh and clear.”

“Footprints?”

“Footprints.”

“A man’s or a woman’s?”

Dr. Mortimer looked strangely at us for an instant, and his voice sank almost to a whisper as he answered.

“Mr. Holmes, they were the footprints of a gigantic hound.”

From ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.

Barrymore was Sir Charles’s butler.

Précis
After Sir Charles Baskerville was found dead at the gate of his own house on Dartmoor, Dr Mortimer was called to the scene. He told Sherlock Holmes that Sir Charles’s face had some dreadful emotion stamped on it, and that near the body were footprints — not of any man or woman, but of a gigantic hound.
Questions for Critics

1. What is the author aiming to achieve in writing this?

2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that strike you. How do they help the author communicate his ideas more effectively?

3. What impression does this passage make on you? How might you put that impression into words?

Based on The English Critic (1939) by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn, Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University, USA.

Sevens

Suggest answers to this question. See if you can limit one answer to exactly seven words.

Why did Dr Mortimer find it difficult to recognise Sir Charles?

Suggestion

Because his face was twisted by fear.

Jigsaws

Express the ideas below in a single sentence, using different words as much as possible. Do not be satisfied with the first answer you think of; think of several, and choose the best.

Dr Mortimer examined Sir Charles’s body. He said there was no sign of physical injury.

See if you can include one or more of these words in your answer.

IFind. IIPost mortem. IIIReveal.

Read Next

One Delicious Grinding Snip

If little Maggie Tulliver is going to get her hair cut, it’s going to be done on her own terms.

Love’s Last Knot

Richard Crashaw offers the hope of eternity for wedded love.

The Common Tongue

The English language is the most valuable part of our national heritage, and the patriotic citizen is careful to treat it with respect.