The Great Chessboard

Adam Smith contrasted two political types, the man of humanity and benevolence and the man of system. The man of humanity and benevolence, he said, acts by persuasion rather than force; and some aspects of society may not please him, he does not impose his own values by force because he respects social custom and individual choice.

The man of system, Smith went on, enforces his vision upon society as if playing a game of chess with dumb and unfeeling pieces. But the pawns and knights on society’s chessboard are awake and will stubbornly execute their own strategy, warned Smith, one which the politician should not arrogantly assume is inferior to his own.

113 words

Read the whole story

Return to the Index

Related Posts

for The Great Chessboard

Liberty and Prosperity

Private Prudence, Public Folly

Adam Smith contrasted the Government’s handling of the national economy with the way most families handled theirs.

Liberty and Prosperity

The Most Perfect State of Civil Liberty

Chinese merchant Lien Chi tells a colleague that English liberties have little to do with elections, taxes and regulations.

Liberty and Prosperity

Folly and Freedom

Britain’s colonies were founded to supply her Government with gold, but instead they supplied her people with liberty.

Liberty and Prosperity

The Empire of Enterprise

Adam Smith credited the British Empire’s success not to the policy of her Government, but to the character of her people.