A Conflict of Interest

In 1776, groundbreaking economist Adam Smith warned the East India Company against trying to act both as governors of India and as a European merchant company. These roles were mutually incompatible, because they were constantly bidding against themselves for the best deals; moreover, as foreign merchants they commanded respect in India only by the force of arms.

As European merchants, the Company’s duty was to make profits for European clients; but as governors of India, it was to secure India’s economic and social well-being. The Company chose European profits over India’s welfare, leading them to subdue India by military force, and limit India’s economic growth so that European rivals would not be tempted to challenge their monopoly.

116 words

Read the whole story

Return to the Index

Related Posts

for A Conflict of Interest

Liberty and Prosperity

Private Prudence, Public Folly

Adam Smith contrasted the Government’s handling of the national economy with the way most families handled theirs.

Liberty and Prosperity

The Real Merchant

William Cobbett makes a distinction between everyday business and the murky world of Westminster lobbyists and financial speculation.

Liberty and Prosperity

Free Trade, Free Peoples

Oldham’s firebrand MP William Cobbett rips into the the City of London for blocking economic and political progress in India.

Indian History

An Avoidable Tragedy

Adam Smith argued that the Bengal Famine of 1769 would have been much less of a tragedy under a free trade policy.