Eureka!

AS much water ran out as was equal in bulk to that of the silver sunk in the vessel. Then, taking out the mass, he poured back the lost quantity of water, using a pint measure, until it was level with the brim as it had been before. Thus he found the weight of silver corresponding to a definite quantity of water.

After this experiment, he likewise dropped the mass of gold into the full vessel and, on taking it out and measuring as before, found that not so much water was lost, but a smaller quantity: namely, as much less as a mass of gold lacks in bulk compared to a mass of silver of the same weight.* Finally, filling the vessel again and dropping the crown itself into the same quantity of water, he found that more water ran over for the crown than for the mass of gold of the same weight. Hence, reasoning from the fact that more water was lost in the case of the crown than in that of the mass, he detected the mixing of silver with the gold, and made the theft of the contractor perfectly clear.

abridged

Abridged from ‘Ten Books of Architecture’ IX 9-12 by Marcus Vitruvius Pollio (?80–70 BC – ?15+ BC), translated (1914) by Morris Hicky Morgan (1859-1910).

* The craftsman had taken care to make his crown weigh the same as the lump of gold given to him by Hiero, thinking that this was the only test anyone could make. But Archimedes realised that gold is unusually heavy, so if something else had been mixed into it, the crown would have to be bulkier in order to register the same overall weight. But how to measure the volume (not weight) of metal in such a curiously-shaped object without melting it down? The water displacement test found this out: the crown displaced more water than a solid block of gold did, revealing that it was slightly too bulky and therefore an excess of some lighter material had been added in.

Précis
Archimedes realised that as gold is denser than silver, a crown of adulterated gold had to be bulkier than one of pure gold in order to reach the same weight. So he used a tub of water to show that Hiero’s crown displaced too much water to be pure gold, and the craftsman’s fraud was detected.
Questions for Critics

1. What is the author aiming to achieve in writing this?

2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that strike you. How do they help the author communicate his ideas more effectively?

3. What impression does this passage make on you? How might you put that impression into words?

Based on The English Critic (1939) by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn, Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University, USA.

Read Next

Strong Speech

Ralph Waldo Emerson traced a common thread running throughout English literature.

Athelstan and the Prince of Norway

Soon after Athelstan became England’s first king, he played a trick on the King of Norway which demanded a reply.

Mistress Liberty

Lord Halifax tacks gratefully into the Winds of Liberty, though he trims his sails to avoid being blown into republicanism.