By an unknown artist, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain. Source
Edward Livingstone, US Congressman and later Ambassador to France.
X
Edward Livingston (1764-1836), by an unknown artist. During the debate in 1798, the charge that the critics of Adams’s Government used violent language particularly annoyed him. Livingston read out, with pardonable satisfaction, a portion of a speech by John Adams himself, in which he had advocated taking up arms against an unsatisfactory US Government. See also A Hot Tip, where under similar provocation English MP John Bright read out a passage from one of Benjamin Disraeli’s novels.
Back to text
Edward Livingstone, US Congressman and later Ambassador to France.
Enlarge & read more...
By an unknown artist, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain.
Edward Livingston (1764-1836), by an unknown artist. During the debate in 1798, the charge that the critics of Adams’s Government used violent language particularly annoyed him. Livingston read out, with pardonable satisfaction, a portion of a speech by John Adams himself, in which he had advocated taking up arms against an unsatisfactory US Government. See also A Hot Tip, where under similar provocation English MP John Bright read out a passage from one of Benjamin Disraeli’s novels.
Then, said Mr Livingston, he will either restrict the members from speaking, or, in some way, prevent the people from knowing what has been said. How is this to be done? By shackling newspapers, and preventing that free communication of sentiment which has heretofore been expressed on public topics.
Mr Livingston avowed with pride the sentiments which he had uttered in the House, and to which gentlemen objected. He could not see how acts made contrary to the Constitution could be binding upon the people; unless gentlemen say Congress may act in contravention to the Constitution.
Mr Otis asked who were to be the judges?
Mr Livingston answered, the people of the United States. We, said he, are their servants; when we exceed our powers, we become their tyrants!*
* After much haggling the Bill crept over the line and became law as the Sedition Act (1798), with a sunset clause automatically repealing it in 1801. It was not renewed, and the Federalist Party that had pushed it through never recovered from the shame of it. The Americans should have learnt from the experience of the Government in England, which had just taken on the Morning Chronicle, and lost: see No Danger in Discussion.
Questions for Critics
1. What is the author
aiming to achieve in writing this?
2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that
strike you. How do they help the author communicate his
ideas more effectively?
3. What impression does this passage make on you?
How might you put that impression into words?
Based on The English Critic (1939)
by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at
Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn,
Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University,
USA.
About the Author
Edward Livingston (1764-1836) was a US statesman. After representing New York in Congress, he served as the city’s Mayor in 1801-1803. He returned to Congress, this time for Louisiana, in 1823-29. In 1831, he was appointed Secretary of State, moving two years later to the post of Minister to France. He retired from public service in 1835. Livingston was praised at home and in Britain for his proposed code of criminal law (never adopted) based on seeking reform rather than retribution. His brother Robert R. Livingston negotiated the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.
Suggest answers to this question. See
if you can limit one answer to exactly
seven words.
According to Livingston, what was it that only US citizens were competent to judge?
Suggestion
Whether the Government had broken the Constitution.
(7 words)
Variations:
1.expand your answer to exactly fourteen words.2.expand your answer further, to exactly twenty-one words.3.include one of the following words in your answer: if, but, despite, because, (al)though, unless.
JigsawsBased on this passage
Express the ideas below in a single
sentence, using different words as much as possible.
Do not be satisfied with the first answer you
think of; think of several, and choose the best.
Suppose a law is unconstitutional. You cannot make the people obey it.
Variation:
Try rewriting your sentence so that it uses one or more of
these words:
1.Contravene 2.No 3.Otherwise
For each group of words, compose a sentence that uses all three. You can use any form of the word: for example, cat → cats, go → went, or quick → quickly, though neigh → neighbour is stretching it a bit.
This exercise uses words found in the accompanying passage.
1Communication.Must.Not.
2Give.Like.People.
3Although.Power.Turn.
Variations:1.include direct and indirect speech2.include one or more of these words: although, because, despite, either/or, if, unless, until, when, whether, which, who3.use negatives (not, isn’t, neither/nor, never, nobody etc.)
Make words (three letters or more) from the seven letters showing below, using any letter once only. Each letter carries a score. What is the highest-scoring word you can make?
If you like what I’m doing here on Clay Lane,
from time to time you could
buy me a coffee.
Buy Me a
Coffee is a crowdfunding website, used by over a million people. It is designed
to help content creators like me make a living from their work. ‘Buy Me a
Coffee’ prides itself on its security, and
there is no need to register.
Related Posts
‘If They Can Stand It I Can’
ByAbraham Lincoln
However loud his critics shouted their disapproval,
Abraham Lincoln would neither deprive them of free speech nor change his opinions.