The Copy Book

Unsuitable for Export

Our peculiar brand of democracy and liberty is a noble thing, but we should be wary of recommending it to other countries.

Abridged

Part 1 of 2

1896

Queen Victoria 1837-1901

Show Photo

A container ship near the port of Felixstowe, Suffolk.
© John Fielding, Wikimedia Commons. Licence: CC BY-SA 2.0.

More Info

Back to text

Unsuitable for Export

© John Fielding, Wikimedia Commons. Licence: CC BY-SA 2.0. Source

A container ship near the port of Felixstowe, Suffolk.

X

A container ship near the port of Felixstowe, Suffolk, the UK’s busiest port. To this day, we hear many voices urging that Britain and other Western nations should export their ‘liberty and democracy’ to other countries, preferably by insistent persuasion but if necessary by economic sanctions or military intervention. Creighton would have doubted very much the wisdom of this. The English, he said, should study foreign peoples and their history a little more carefully before handing out advice. See National Sympathy.

Back to text

Introduction

Historian Mandell Creighton believed unlike our Continental neighbours, when the English laid down our Constitution we were driven not by ideological purity or a passion for order but by a desire to protect our customs and little oddities. Though this worked well for us, foreign nations had some trouble getting it to work for them — and they were starting to notice it.

IT is difficult to refer the growth of English institutions to any very definite principles. Their development did not come from the expansive power of general ideas, but was largely the result of cautious adjustment to the facts of national life. There was always a dread of the rigidity of any system, however excellent; and there was always a resolute maintenance of national, and even of local, customs, against attempts to read them into the terms of a consistent and orderly arrangement. English customs were put into writing, not with a view to their codification, but that they might be maintained against a logical system which was being imported from abroad. [...]

There is, however, another consequence of the antiquity of our institutions, for which we undeservedly suffer in foreign estimation. We are responsible for having invented a form of government which suits ourselves, and seems simple in its main lines, but which really depends on so much beneath those main lines that it is unfitted for exportation.

Continue to Part 2

Précis

In a lecture in 1896, historian Mandell Creighton reminded his audience that English mediaeval law was not codified in order to enshrine some ideology, or achieve legal purity. It was created to prevent ideologically driven Continental lawmakers encroaching on cherished English customs. Consequently, it is still so bound up with those customs that it does not lend itself to export. (60 / 60 words)

In a lecture in 1896, historian Mandell Creighton reminded his audience that English mediaeval law was not codified in order to enshrine some ideology, or achieve legal purity. It was created to prevent ideologically driven Continental lawmakers encroaching on cherished English customs. Consequently, it is still so bound up with those customs that it does not lend itself to export.

Edit | Reset

Variations: 1.increase the length of this precis to exactly 65 words. 2.reduce the length of this precis to exactly 55 words. 3.introduce one of the following words into the precis: although, despite, if, just, must, since, until, who.

If you like what I’m doing here on Clay Lane, from time to time you could buy me a coffee.

Buy Me a Coffee is a crowdfunding website, used by over a million people. It is designed to help content creators like me make a living from their work. ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ prides itself on its security, and there is no need to register.