The Copy Book

The Zong Massacre

After a hundred and forty-two slaves were tossed overboard in an insurance scam, Granville Sharp wouldn’t let the matter rest.

Part 1 of 2

1781

King George III 1760-1820

By JMW Turner (1775-1851), Wikimedia Commons. Licence: Public domain.

Show More

Back to text

The Zong Massacre

By JMW Turner (1775-1851), Wikimedia Commons. Licence: Public domain. Source
X

‘The Slave Ship’, first exhibited in 1840, and originally entitled ‘Slavers throwing overboard the Dead and Dying — Typhoon coming on’. Turner was inspired to paint the scene after reading Thomas Clarkson’s ‘The History and Abolition of the Slave Trade’, which naturally included an account of the scandalous ‘Zong’ massacre in 1781. Close inspection of the canvas reveals the hands of desperate drowning men, dead bodies and hungry birds.

Back to text

Introduction

The scandal of the slave-ship ‘Zong’ was one of the turning points in the campaign to end slavery throughout the British Empire. As so often, the quest for justice was led by self-taught jurist Granville Sharp, who turned to the Press after a sensational court case had failed to deliver any kind of justice at all.

ON August 18th, 1781, a slave-ship named Zong left Accra in Ghana with 442 slaves on board, bound for Jamaica. Over-laden and under-crewed, the ship reached the Caribbean late in November, but by this time sickness had ravaged the ship. One of those affected was her master, Luke Collingwood, and in the chaos the ship not only missed a water stop at Tobago, but sailed right past Jamaica, apparently mistaking it for Hispaniola.

When Zong eventually put into Jamaica on December 22nd, there were only 208 slaves on board, a loss of 234. Collingwood coolly told the owners, Gregson’s of Liverpool, that 142 slaves had been tossed overboard to save on water; and he added, that as these ‘parcels’ had not perished on board but been jettisoned to save the rest of the cargo, Gregson’s should put in a claim to the insurers to cover their loss. The underwriters were far from convinced, however, and to avoid paying up they went to court in March 1783.*

Continue to Part 2

Gregson v. Gilbert (1783) 3 Doug 232, 99 ER 629.