The Copy Book

The Court of the Past

We should not force ourselves and ‘our values’ onto the writers of the past.

Part 1 of 2

1864

Queen Victoria 1837-1901

Show Photo

A self-portrait of John Ruskin.
By John Ruskin, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain.

More Info

A self-portrait of John Ruskin, made in 1861. Ruskin’s Sesame and Lilies (1865) was based on two lectures given in Manchester in 1864. The first of them, ‘The King’s Treasures’, spoke of books as the storehouses of delightful knowledge, and urged that time spent among good books is time spent among the best and most improving company. But unlike the company of living friends, Ruskin reminds us, the nobles of the ‘court of the past’ cannot hear us; they are beyond the reach of our persuasion, our ambition, our jealousy or our self-importance. Ruskin would have had little patience with those who barged into the company in order to dazzle or daunt with Marxism or critical theory. That court is a place for courteous listening, not for talking, and certainly not for shouting.

Back to text

The Court of the Past

By John Ruskin, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain. Source

A self-portrait of John Ruskin.

X

A self-portrait of John Ruskin, made in 1861. Ruskin’s Sesame and Lilies (1865) was based on two lectures given in Manchester in 1864. The first of them, ‘The King’s Treasures’, spoke of books as the storehouses of delightful knowledge, and urged that time spent among good books is time spent among the best and most improving company. But unlike the company of living friends, Ruskin reminds us, the nobles of the ‘court of the past’ cannot hear us; they are beyond the reach of our persuasion, our ambition, our jealousy or our self-importance. Ruskin would have had little patience with those who barged into the company in order to dazzle or daunt with Marxism or critical theory. That court is a place for courteous listening, not for talking, and certainly not for shouting.

Back to text

Introduction

In Sesame and Lilies, John Ruskin warned us not to try to manipulate the great writers of the past into agreeing with us or our times. And if we have so little respect for them as to want to try, we would be better off not entering the ‘court of the past’ at all.

This court of the past differs from all living aristocracy in this:— it is open to labour and to merit, but to nothing else. No wealth will bribe, no name overawe, no artifice deceive, the guardian of those Elysian gates.* In the deep sense, no vile or vulgar person ever enters there. At the portières of that silent Faubourg St Germain,* there is but brief question:— “Do you deserve to enter?”* “Pass. Do you ask to be the companion of nobles? Make yourself noble, and you shall be. Do you long for the conversation of the wise? Learn to understand it, and you shall hear it. But on other terms? — no. If you will not rise to us, we cannot stoop to you. The living lord may assume courtesy, the living philosopher explain his thought to you with considerate pain; but here we neither feign nor interpret; you must rise to the level of our thoughts if you would be gladdened by them, and share our feelings, if you would recognise our presence.”

Continue to Part 2

* Elysium was the ancient Greeks’ abode of the blessed dead, as contrasted with Hades.

* Faubourg St Germain was for many generations Paris’s fashionable intellectual centre. Ruskin’s idea was that the congregation of dead writers in Elysium, the silent ‘court of the past’, makes the abode of the blessed into a grand salon like Faubourg St Germain — or in British terms, Walter Scott’s Abbotsford, or Virginia Woolf’s Bloomsbury.

* Italian poet Dante Alighieri (1265-1321) imagined that above the gates of Hades was written: “Abandon hope all ye that enter here”. Ruskin now suggests a message for neighbouring Elysium: “Do you deserve to enter?”.

Word Games

Sevens Based on this passage

Suggest answers to this question. See if you can limit one answer to exactly seven words.

What did Ruskin mean by ‘the court of the past’?

Suggestion

Variations: 1.expand your answer to exactly fourteen words. 2.expand your answer further, to exactly twenty-one words. 3.include one of the following words in your answer: if, but, despite, because, (al)though, unless.

Jigsaws Based on this passage

Express the ideas below in a single sentence, using different words as much as possible. Do not be satisfied with the first answer you think of; think of several, and choose the best.

We can persuade the living. We cannot persuade the dead.

Variation: Try rewriting your sentence so that it uses one or more of these words: 1. Agree 2. Beyond 3. Change

If you like what I’m doing here on Clay Lane, from time to time you could buy me a coffee.

Buy Me a Coffee is a crowdfunding website, used by over a million people. It is designed to help content creators like me make a living from their work. ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ prides itself on its security, and there is no need to register.