The Copy Book

Picking on Cotton

The politicians of Georgian England went to surprising lengths to shield domestic businesses from overseas competition.

Abridged

Part 1 of 2

on the 1760s

King George III 1760-1820

Show Photo

English sack dress, silk, 1760s.
© Auckland Museum, Wikimedia COmmons. CC BY-SA 4.0.

More Info

An English sack or sacque dress from the 1760s, formerly owned by a maid of honour in the court of King George III. It is made mostly of self-striped silk, with floral patterns, though there is some padding with cotton wool (a legal exemption to the struct rules on cotton). This cream colour is the result of fading: originally the dress was a shimmering pale blue, of which some hints remain.

Back to text

Picking on Cotton

© Auckland Museum, Wikimedia COmmons. CC BY-SA 4.0. Source

English sack dress, silk, 1760s.

X

An English sack or sacque dress from the 1760s, formerly owned by a maid of honour in the court of King George III. It is made mostly of self-striped silk, with floral patterns, though there is some padding with cotton wool (a legal exemption to the struct rules on cotton). This cream colour is the result of fading: originally the dress was a shimmering pale blue, of which some hints remain.

Back to text

Introduction

A feature of the eighteenth century was the Government’s ongoing, desperate and self-defeating attempt to support English industry by slapping taxes, tariffs and regulations on overseas competitors. Here, historian William Lecky looks at a few of the more egregious examples, from banning foreigners’ products to denying them technology.

At the end of the seventeenth century great quantities of cheap and graceful Indian calicoes, muslins, and chintzes were imported into England, and they found such favour that the woollen and silk manufacturers were seriously alarmed. Acts of Parliament were accordingly passed in 1700 and in 1721 absolutely prohibiting, with a very few specified exceptions, the employment of printed or dyed calicoes in England, either in dress or in furniture, and the use of any printed or dyed goods of which cotton formed any part.* A taste, however, had sprung up which it was found impossible to arrest, and a native manufacture began, though of more than doubtful legality. Manchester became its chief centre, and it was at last recognised, though with some restrictions, by an Act of 1736.* [...]

A law of George I, passed in the interest of the silk manufacturers, prohibited anyone from wearing buttons and button-holes made of cloth or other stuff.* In 1766 a lady was fined 200l. at the Guild Hall because it was proved that her handkerchief was of French cambric.*

Continue to Part 2

* There were two so-called Calico Acts, not repealed until 1774. Macpherson’s Annals of Commerce recorded for the year 1721: “An act of parliament was therefor passed, to preserve and encourage the woollen and silk manufadures, &c. which absolutely prohibited the wear thereof, under the penalty of £5 for each offence on the wearer, and of £20 on the seller.”

* The exemptions in the Act of 1720 allowed for thread Fustian and raw cotton, which led to the small but spirited domestic market in cotton goods that forced recognition from Parliament in 1736.

* Dated 1720: “An Act for imploying the Manufacturers, and encouraging the Consumption of Raw Silk and Mohair Yarn, by prohibiting the Wearing of Buttons and Button Holes made of Cloth, Serge or other Stuffs.”

* This was reported in the Annual Register for the events of the previous year. “There was a trial lately at Guildhall upon a question whether a handkerchief seized upon a lady, was a French cambrick; the thing being clearly proved, she was condemned to pay 200l.”

Précis

Historian William Lecky looked back over eighteenth-century regulations intended to prop up the British silk and wool industries in the face of competition from abroad, especially India. The Calico Acts laid the ground in the early decades, and despite some exemptions, by the 1760s the wearing of cotton could attract hefty fines. (52 / 60 words)

Historian William Lecky looked back over eighteenth-century regulations intended to prop up the British silk and wool industries in the face of competition from abroad, especially India. The Calico Acts laid the ground in the early decades, and despite some exemptions, by the 1760s the wearing of cotton could attract hefty fines.

Edit | Reset

Variations: 1.increase the length of this precis to exactly 55 words. 2.reduce the length of this precis to exactly 45 words. 3.introduce one of the following words into the precis: about, although, because, besides, if, ought, since, unless.

Word Games

Sevens Based on this passage

Suggest answers to this question. See if you can limit one answer to exactly seven words.

Why did Parliament place restrictions on cotton imports in the early eighteenth century?

Suggestion

Variations: 1.expand your answer to exactly fourteen words. 2.expand your answer further, to exactly twenty-one words. 3.include one of the following words in your answer: if, but, despite, because, (al)though, unless.

Jigsaws Based on this passage

Express the ideas below in a single sentence, using different words as much as possible. Do not be satisfied with the first answer you think of; think of several, and choose the best.

A lot of cotton was imported from India. This alarmed wool magnates. They lobbied Parliament to ban it.

Variation: Try rewriting your sentence so that it uses one or more of these words: 1. Anxiety 2. Brisk 3. Such

If you like what I’m doing here on Clay Lane, from time to time you could buy me a coffee.

Buy Me a Coffee is a crowdfunding website, used by over a million people. It is designed to help content creators like me make a living from their work. ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ prides itself on its security, and there is no need to register.