The Copy Book

Intolerable Power

If Parliament is going to force its will on distant peoples, it must also give them the vote.

Part 1 of 2

1775

King George III 1760-1820

Show Photo

A chilly April day in colonial Williamsburg
© Mobilus in Mobili, Wikimedia Commons. Licence: CC BY-SA 2.0.

More Info

Back to text

Intolerable Power

© Mobilus in Mobili, Wikimedia Commons. Licence: CC BY-SA 2.0. Source

A chilly April day in colonial Williamsburg

X

An actress wraps up against a chill April breeze in Williamsburg, Virginia, home to a living museum of life in colonial times. Granville Sharp is remembered today — or rather, should be, because he is largely forgotten — as the man who almost single-handedly forced the English courts to concede that slavery is and always has been illegal in England. The thirteen colonies’ secession in 1783, following their revolutionary war, meant that they were not obliged to obey the British Parliament’s ban on the slave trade across the Empire in 1807, or the outright ban (more or less) on slavery itself in 1833. The United States did not officially catch up until Abraham Lincoln’s emancipation decree in 1863, during the Civil War of 1861-65.

Back to text

Introduction

In 1775, anti-slavery campaigner Granville Sharp leapt to the defence of inhabitants of Britain’s thirteen American colonies, who were demanding to be represented in the House of Commons if they were expected to obey the laws passed there. No government, Sharp declared, is legitimate if the common people who are expected to obey its decisions — whether at home or far abroad — are not closely and frequently involved in the decision-making process.

IT is not only Treason against the Constitution to attempt to deprive any free British subjects of their natural Right to a Share in the Legislature, but it is equally derogatory and injurious to the Authority of the Crown; because a King of England has no legal Authority to govern by any other mode than that limited government called the English Constitution which he is sworn to maintain; for such is the frailty of human nature, that no man or body of men whatever is to be entrusted with the administration of government, unless they are thus limited by law and by a due representation of the people at large, subject to a frequent appeal, by Election, to the whole body of constituents.

Continue to Part 2

Précis

In 1775, anti-slavery campaigner Granville Sharp came to the defence of the American revolutionaries, arguing that taxing them while denying them the vote went against the English constitution. Our constitution, he said, recognised that no man may possess unlimited power, and such power as he does have must be validated by frequent general elections. (54 / 60 words)

In 1775, anti-slavery campaigner Granville Sharp came to the defence of the American revolutionaries, arguing that taxing them while denying them the vote went against the English constitution. Our constitution, he said, recognised that no man may possess unlimited power, and such power as he does have must be validated by frequent general elections.

Edit | Reset

Variations: 1.increase the length of this precis to exactly 60 words. 2.reduce the length of this precis to exactly 50 words. 3.introduce one of the following words into the precis: although, besides, despite, if, ought, since, whether, who.

If you like what I’m doing here on Clay Lane, from time to time you could buy me a coffee.

Buy Me a Coffee is a crowdfunding website, used by over a million people. It is designed to help content creators like me make a living from their work. ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ prides itself on its security, and there is no need to register.