The Copy Book

A Right and a Duty

The tighter the US Government’s stranglehold on dissent grew, the harder Daniel Webster fought for freedom of speech.

Part 1 of 2

1814

King George III 1760-1820

Show Photo

By Henry R. Robinson, via the Library of Congress and Wikimedia Commons. Licence: Public domain.

More Info

Back to text

A Right and a Duty

By Henry R. Robinson, via the Library of Congress and Wikimedia Commons. Licence: Public domain. Source
X

‘The Presidential Sweepstakes of 1844’ shows the runners and riders for the US elections that year, in which Democrat candidate James K. Polk defeated Whig Party candidate Henry Clay. Clay is the horse to the top left, ridden by jockey Daniel Webster; Polk is next, followed by Martin Van Buren, John C. Calhoun, Richard M. Johnson and John Tyler. Webster’s own Presidential run in 1848 ended in disappointment. Click here for more. Webster’s stirring defence of free speech would find little favour today. Free speech is considered dangerous to society, allowing prejudice and ignorance to flourish. And yet, in a culture of free speech prejudice and ignorance are inexcusable vices, since the truth is always at hand; whereas under a culture of censorship, prejudice and ignorance (of the right kind) are taught as patriotic virtues.

Back to text

Introduction

In 1814, the USA was still embroiled in the War of 1812 with Great Britain. Many citizens of east coast States were dismayed, holding that the war was wrecking the economy for no demonstrable gain. President James Madison’s pro-France hawks in Washington responded by trying to silence critics as traitors, but young Daniel Webster, recently elected to Congress as Member for New Hampshire, was defiant.

IMPORTANT as I deem it, to discuss on all proper occasions, the policy of the measures at present pursued, it is still more important to maintain the right of such discussion, in its full and just extent. Sentiments lately sprung up, and now growing fashionable, make it necessary to be explicit on this point. The more I perceive a disposition to check the freedom of inquiry by extravagant and unconstitutional pretences, the firmer shall be the tone, in which I shall assert, and the freer the manner, in which I shall exercise it. It is the ancient and undoubted prerogative of this people to canvass* public measures, and the merits of public men. It is a ‘home-bred right’; a fireside privilege. It hath ever been enjoyed in every house, cottage, and cabin in the nation. It is not to be drawn into the controversy. It is as undoubted as the right of breathing the air, or walking on the earth.

Continue to Part 2

* Canvass here means ‘discuss, debate’.

Précis

When James Madison’s USA cracked down on criticism of the War of 1812, Congressman Daniel Webster rose in the House to say that even before the merits of the war could be debated, the issue of free speech must be settled. The people had an inalienable right to criticise politicians and their policies, that he would defend without fail. (59 / 60 words)

When James Madison’s USA cracked down on criticism of the War of 1812, Congressman Daniel Webster rose in the House to say that even before the merits of the war could be debated, the issue of free speech must be settled. The people had an inalienable right to criticise politicians and their policies, that he would defend without fail.

Edit | Reset

Variations: 1.increase the length of this precis to exactly 65 words. 2.reduce the length of this precis to exactly 55 words. 3.introduce one of the following words into the precis: besides, despite, just, ought, since, until, whereas, whether.

If you like what I’m doing here on Clay Lane, from time to time you could buy me a coffee.

Buy Me a Coffee is a crowdfunding website, used by over a million people. It is designed to help content creators like me make a living from their work. ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ prides itself on its security, and there is no need to register.