The Quiet Kingdom

HE, in fact, Dr Smith told me, loved the people of this country and understood their language and manners in a very unusual degree. He was on terms of close friendship with Zalim Singh of Kotah, and has left a name there as honourable as in Udaipur.* His misfortune was that, in consequence of his favouring the native princes so much, the Government of Calcutta were led to suspect him of corruption, and consequently to narrow his powers and associate other officers with him in his trust, till he was disgusted and resigned his place. They are now, I believe, well satisfied that their suspicions were groundless. Captain Tod is strenuously vindicated from the charge by all the officers with whom I have conversed, and some of whom have had abundant means of knowing what the natives themselves thought of him.*

spelling modernised

From ‘Narrative of a journey through the upper provinces of India’ (2 vols) Vol. 2, by Bishop Reginald Heber (1783-1826). With acknowledgements to ‘Feudal Polity in Mewar’ by T. K. Mathur.

This friendship was a source of controversy, when Kishah Singh rebelled against Zalim, and accused Tod of playing favourites. Tod’s superior, the colourful Massachusetts-born Major-general Sir David Ochterlony (1758-1825), British Resident to the Mughal court at Delhi, took the complaint as an opportunity to strip Tod of some of his responsibilities — the dislike was mutual, fuelled in part by Ochterlony’s idolising of the Mughal Emperors and Tod’s conviction that they had oppressed the Rajputs. As a consequence, Tod tended to appeal over Ochterolony’s head to Calcutta, which made things worse.

Reginald Heber was the Church of England’s Bishop of Calcutta from 1822 to his sudden death in 1826. He is best known today as the author of the hymns ‘Brightest and Best of the Sons of the Morning’ (1811) and ‘Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty’ (1826).

Précis
Heber explained that he had heard less than favourable accounts of Tod from the Government back in Calcutta, but that what he was hearing in Udaipur confirmed what he had already come to believe, that the rumours of corruption were unfounded, and revealed more about those who resented Tod’s enduring popularity with Indians than about Tod himself.
Questions for Critics

1. What is the author aiming to achieve in writing this?

2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that strike you. How do they help the author communicate his ideas more effectively?

3. What impression does this passage make on you? How might you put that impression into words?

Based on The English Critic (1939) by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn, Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University, USA.

Sevens

Suggest answers to this question. See if you can limit one answer to exactly seven words.

What, according to Heber’s information, was the relationship like between Tod and the people of Mewar?

Suggestion

He had heard it was very friendly.

Jigsaws

Express the ideas below in a single sentence, using different words as much as possible. Do not be satisfied with the first answer you think of; think of several, and choose the best.

Tod liked the Rajputs. He wrote books about them. Scholars still use his books for research.

Read Next

An Excellent Performance

On a visit to England in 1599, Swiss doctor Thomas Platter found time to pop across the Thames and take in a show.

The Travellers and the Axe

Two men find an axe, and then find some trouble, but they aren’t keen on sharing either of them.

The Last Voyage of Scyld of the Sheaf

The Old English epic ‘Beowulf’ tells how Scyld, beloved King of the Danes, was committed to the ocean at his death — just as he had been at his birth.