The Most Liberal State in Europe

THEY considered the plebeians as a wild beast, whom it behoved them to let loose upon their neighbours, for fear they should devour their masters. Thus the greatest defect in the Government of the Romans raised them to be conquerors. By being unhappy at home, they triumphed over and possessed themselves of the world, till at last their divisions sunk them to slavery.

The Government of England will never rise to so exalted a pitch of glory, nor will its end be so fatal. The English are not fired with the splendid folly of making conquests, but would only prevent their neighbours from conquering.* They are not only jealous of their own liberty, but even of that of other nations. The English were exasperated against Louis XIV for no other reason but because he was ambitious, and declared war against him merely out of levity, not from any interested motives.*

The English have doubtless purchased their liberties at a very high price, and waded through seas of blood to drown the idol of arbitrary power. Other nations have been involved in as great calamities, and have shed as much blood; but then the blood they spilt in defence of their liberties only enslaved them the more.*

From ‘Letters on the English’ (1733), by ‘Voltaire’ (François-Marie Arouet, 1694-1778).

* In 1757, some twenty-four years later, The Battle of Plassey proved to be the starting gun for Britain’s rapid colonial expansion; even so, many observers saw it not as ‘the splendid folly of making conquests’ but as an unplanned by-product of a peculiarly English compulsion to trade and to explore: see Sir John Seeley on The Absent Minded Conquerors and George Santayana on The Englishman. When the German Empire offered herself as an imperial conqueror in the Roman mould, Britain’s possessions greatly surprised the Kaiser by fighting lustily at our side: see John Buchan on The Garden and the Machine.

* Voltaire was presumably referring to The War of the Spanish Succession in 1702-1713, in which England (and from 1707 Great Britain) stepped into an essentially Continental dispute over who should inherit the dominions of King Charles II of Spain, following his death in 1700. Not only Spain and the Netherlands but also Austria, Italy and Portugal all saw the war as a fight for their own freedom, and to Voltaire it seemed that in entering the lists as their champion the English had been guilty of sheer quixotry.

* Whether Voltaire would have felt that the French Revolution of 1789 broke the unhappy cycle of European history can only be guessed. Sir Reginald Coupland (1884-1952) was one of those who thought that the cycle had simply repeated itself: see Raw Haste.

Précis
The Romans, admitted Voltaire, had benefited from their disenfranchisement of the public by the boost given to their overseas conquests; but by giving the public a say in government, England had benefited more. The Romans, and other European nations, always sank back into slavery, whereas the English grew ever more free.
Questions for Critics

1. What is the author aiming to achieve in writing this?

2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that strike you. How do they help the author communicate his ideas more effectively?

3. What impression does this passage make on you? How might you put that impression into words?

Based on The English Critic (1939) by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn, Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University, USA.

Read Next

His Bright Nativity

Anglo-Saxon poet Cynewulf wonders at the mystery of the Bethlehem manger, where all the light of heaven was shining.

Not Worth a Shilling

Jack Curran’s career as a defender of victims of political prejudice got off to a stuttering start.

A Passion for Meddling

Richard Cobden questioned both the wisdom and the motives of politicians who intervene on foreign soil.