The Black Rood of Scotland

Notwithstanding that the King, the Night before the Battle, was in a Dream admonished, that in no wise he should attempt to violate the Church goods of St Cuthbert, or any Thing pertaining to that holy Saint, which he did most presumptuously disdain, destroying as much as he could of the said Goods and Lands belonging to St Cuthbert. He was not only punished by God Almighty in his own Captivity, being taken in the Field of Battle, and sore wounded, having first valiantly fought; but there was also taken with him four Earls, two Lords, the Archbishop of St Andrews, one other Bishop, one Knight, with many others: And in the Battle were slain seven Earls of Scotland, besides many Lords, and fifteen thousand Scotsmen; as also by the Loss of the said Cross, and many other most excellent Jewels and Monuments which were brought from Scotland, and other Noblemen’s Banners, which were all offered to the Shrine of St Cuthbert, for the beautifying and adorning thereof; together with the Black Rood of Scotland (so termed), with Mary and John; made of Silver, being as it were smoaked all over; which was set up in the Pillar next St Cuthbert’s Shrine, in the South Alley.*

Abridged.

From ‘The Ancient Rites of Durham’ (1672), edited by John Davies (1623-1693). The original text can be read in ‘Rites of Durham’, originally written in 1593, edited by Joseph Thomas Fowler (1833-1924) and published in 1903 by the Surtees Society (vol. CVII, for 1902).

* The Black Rood remained there until the sixteenth century, when Henry VIII’s government assayers, backed by theologians in keeping with Modern Thought, came to the cathedral and took away everything of monetary value, in this case meaning the silver casket, and burned everything else, meaning the relic within. They tried the same trick with the coffin of St Cuthbert: see Cvthbertvs. The cross vanished from history — unless it is wherever the still-uncorrupted body of St Cuthbert lies.

Précis
David II wore the miraculous relic during the battle; but it brought him no help, for he was defying (said the Rites) the message of a dream the previous night, warning him not to disturb the lands of St Cuthbert. Not was he captured, but he lost the cross, which was added to the treasures of St Cuthbert’s shrine.
Questions for Critics

1. What are the authors aiming to achieve in writing this?

2. Note any words, devices or turns of phrase that strike you. How do they help the authors communicate their ideas more effectively?

3. What impression does this passage make on you? How might you put that impression into words?

Based on The English Critic (1939) by NL Clay, drawing on The New Criticism: A Lecture Delivered at Columbia University, March 9, 1910, by J. E. Spingarn, Professor of Comparative Literature in Columbia University, USA.

Sevens

Suggest answers to this question. See if you can limit one answer to exactly seven words.

Why (according to the author) did David deserve to lose his cross?

Suggestion

Because he defied a warning from heaven.

Jigsaws

Express the ideas below in a single sentence, using different words as much as possible. Do not be satisfied with the first answer you think of; think of several, and choose the best.

The English defeated the Scots at Neville’s Cross. Their jewels were given to St Cuthbert’s shrine. These included the Black Rood.

See if you can include one or more of these words in your answer.

IAmong. IITrophy. IIIVictory.

Read Next

Padgett, MP

Lord Cromer, a former Consul-General of Egypt, expressed his frustration at politicians who set too much store by Foreign Office briefings.

Dmitry the Pretender

Boris Godunov was crowned Tsar of All Russia in 1598 in the belief that Tsar Ivan’s son Dmitry was dead — but was he?

An Englishman in Exile

Faced with a choice between silence, dungeon or exile, William Cobbett chose exile — and then had to make sense of it.